Latest Entries »

Week In Review

The college hoops season is well underway. One big story from last week included the re-emergence of Florida, who won the Legends Classic in Atlantic City (and had to beat #2 Michigan State in order to do so). Another big story is the power of the Big East. It has 3 teams that are looking like legitimate top-10 teams (‘Nova, ‘Cuse, West Virginia), 2 or 3 others that are threats to crack the top-10 (UCONN, Georgetown, and Louisville), and at least a few others that are dangerous (Cincy, Notre Dame, Marquette). The conference is very well represented in the current rankings.

In the NBA, the big story of the week is the ongoing horrendousness of the New Jersey Nets, who just fired their coach and went 0-17. Another big story is about THE ANSWER’s possible return to Philly.

I already blogged about THE ANSWER, and I won’t repeat myself here. For now, I’ll add only this: the argument I continue to hear against signing THE ANSWER is that the team considering signing him has some young guy it wants to “develop,” and would rather give minutes to that young guy than to THE ANSWER. The Knicks used this reasoning to explain why they wouldn’t sign THE ANSWER. It made sense in theory, until I looked at the Knicks’ roster, and realized that I couldn’t figure out which young bucks they think they’re grooming to be future stars. Larry Hughes? Wilson Chandler? Nate Robinson? Seriously? Their plan for the future is to turn one of these guys into a superstar?

I would have gotten worked up about it, if I wasn’t so used to hearing nonsense from Knicks’ management. Now the reports say that the Sixers are interested, but that their management has similar concerns. They’re reluctant to sign THE ANSWER because they don’t want to take minutes away from the young bucks that they’re developing. A look at their roster reveals that these young bucks are Willie Green and Jrue Holiday. You know, the two guys who led their teams to, umm, what, exactly?

In 367 career games, Green has averaged 9.4 points per game. Even worse, Jrue Holiday spent one year at UCLA, where he averaged… wait for it… 8.5 points, 3.7 assists, and 3.8 rebounds (his stats are here). Those are his numbers in COLLEGE. The Sixers would rather try to “develop” that guy than sign THE ANSWER?

Kidding aside, let’s assume that those guys have some potential, and that, if they are “developed” properly, they become capable pros who can put up, oh, I don’t know, 15 points, 4 rebounds, and 4 assists per game. It’s a stretch, but let’s go with that assumption. Even if that’s the case, those numbers are not going to be good enough to lead a team to the playoffs. So, while it’s ok to try to “develop” them, it helps to be realistic about what you’re “developing” them to be. Neither one of those guys can be expected to be a team’s primary scorer, so why wouldn’t the Sixers want to bring in a guy who can carry the scoring load, and let those guys “develop” into complementary players? That’s their UPSIDE; to be solid complementary players.

When THE ANSWER fades away, you’ll have to replace him with someone who can carry the scoring load, whom Green and Holiday can complement. Fine. I get it. But that’s no reason not to sign THE ANSWER, because you’re going to have to sign someone else in the future anyway.

Dave Del Grande, a writer for Sportsline, suggests some of the same landing spots for THE ANSWER that I’ve been suggesting, before he launches into his power rankings. ESPN’s power rankings are here.

Some highlights from the week:
Gerald Wallace dunks on LeBron
Great hustle
Get outta my house!!!

Leave a Comment:

One of the big stories of the early season is Brandon Jennings, who has put up a 55-point game, and has led the Bucks to a winning record. He has caught me, and many others, by surprise.

But, while I give him credit for his early success, I don’t see it continuing. I’m basing this not on any insider information I have, or even on a scouting report of the guy, but on the simple fact that he shoots too much for a point guard. His scoring average might remain high, but the Bucks’ success is unlikely to continue.

Jennings has taken 284 shots in his first 15 games, for an average of approximately 19 per game. As a point of comparison, consider some of the numbers put up by the great point guards of the modern era:

In 979 career games, Isiah Thomas took 15,904 shots, for an average of 16.2 per game. He’s at the high end of the spectrum, and he still took more than 2 fewer shots per game than Jennings.

Magic played 906 career games, and took 11,951 shots, for an average of 13.2.
Kidd has played 1,124 games and has taken 13,720 shots, for an average of 12.2.
Nash has played 950 career games, and has taken 10,151 shots, for an average of 10.7.
Stockton played 1,504 career games and took 13,658 shots, for an average of 9.1.

Even in comparison to some of the best young point guards in the league today, he is still at the high end of the spectrum.
Chris Paul has played 310 career games, and has taken 4507 shots, for an average of 14.5 shots.
Rajon Rondo has played 251 career games, and has taken 2072 shots, for an average of 8.3.
Deron Williams has played 324 career games, and has taken 4206 shots, for an average of 13.0.

Clearly, Jennings is shooting more than these successful point guards. Perhaps he is simply so talented that he can break the mold, and redefine the position. I doubt it, for reasons that have nothing to do with questions about his talent. A closer look at his numbers reveals that he shoots 43.3% from the field, and averages 5.5 assists per game. Those numbers compare unfavorably to the numbers of other great point guards:

Magic shot 52% from the field, and averaged 11.2 assists per game.
Stockton shot 51.5% from the field, and averaged 10.5 assists per game.
Nash shoots 48.8% from the field, and averages 8.1 assists per game.
Isiah shot 45% from the field, and averaged 9.3 assists per game.
Kidd shoots 40% from the field, and averages 9.2 assists per game.
Thus, Kidd is the only one with a lower field-goal percentage, and his assist numbers are much higher.

Jennings’s numbers also compare unfavorably to the premiere young guards in the game today:
Paul shoots 47% from the field, and averages 9.9 assists per game.
Rondo shoots 48% from the field, and averages 5.9 assists per game (he averaged more than 8 assists per game in each of the past two seasons).
Williams shoots 46.8% from the field, and averages 8.7 assists per game.

So, Jennings’s numbers, while impressive, raise numerous doubts about his game. To be sure, he is young, and it’s not fair to say that someone is fatally flawed based on the fact that, after only 15 games, his numbers compare unfavorably to some of the greats at his position. But, a point guard’s job is to get his team good shots, and the clearest measurements of success are his assists per game along with his shooting numbers. No point guard that I can think of has led his team to the playoffs, let alone a championship, by passing so little while shooting so often and so poorly.

All of this is based on numbers alone — I haven’t seen him play yet. I tried to DVR the nationally-televised game he played in on Friday, but something went wrong with my DVR. (Amazingly, it seems to tape everything my wife wants to tape, but regularly fails to tape my shows. Coincidence?) I was pretty bummed, not only because I wanted to see Jennings play, but also because I’m quite sure that I’ve watched more than 1,000 games of basketball in my life, and I can’t remember ever watching the Bucks. I mean, seriously, have they been on national TV since Don Nelson stopped coaching them?

I will make sure to watch them soon, even if it means that I have to research for a local bar that will be broadcasting one of their games, and head over there to see them. Until then, all I have to go by when judging Jennings are his numbers. While some of those numbers are impressive, the bottom line is that they are not the kinds of numbers I would want my team’s point guard to be putting up.

Leave a Comment: